Get the App
Cognition & Attention

Decision Making

Choice paralysis, satisficing, maximizing, decision fatigue, the paradox of choice.

30 entries

All behaviors in Decision Making

System: reward

Buyer's Remorse

The acute regret that arrives in the hours or days after a significant purchase — the Reward System's post-decision counterfactual sweep on a transaction that has already cleared, producing residue that does not undo the purchase but does undermine its enjoyment.

System: reward

Choice Paralysis

The Reward System's refusal to supply a verdict when the option set exceeds its capacity to weigh — leaving you suspended in deliberation that feels like careful thinking but produces no choice.

System: reward

Coin-Flip Resolution

Outsourcing a stuck decision to a randomiser — a coin, a die, an app — and reading the flip's verdict, or your reaction to it, as the answer the deliberative system failed to produce.

System: belonging

Crowd-Sourced Decisions

Putting a choice to a vote — a poll on social media, a group chat survey, a quick Reddit thread — and letting the aggregate response stand in for the inward weighing the choice was actually asking for.

System: reward

Decision by Mood

Making decisions whose stakes outlast the day inside the mood of the day — accepting an offer while exuberant, declining one while depressed, ending a relationship while exhausted, committing to a project while inspired — and letting the transient state author a choice the durable self will inherit.

System: reward

Decision Fatigue

The progressive degradation of decision quality over a day as repeated choices deplete the cognitive resource the Reward System uses to weigh options — leaving you to default, defer, or impulse-pick by evening.

System: meaning

Decision Hygiene

A set of small, deliberate practices that protect the deciding faculty from the noise that distorts it — separating the decision from the outcome, the present state from the structural lean, the tribal answer from the inwardly weighed one — so that choices arrive as cleanly as possible from the actual self.

System: reward

Decision Outsourcing

The chronic delegation of personal decisions to others — friends, partners, experts, advice columns, AI — because the Reward System has stopped trusting its own verdict and substitutes external authority for internal weighing.

System: reward

Decision Outsourcing to AI

Handing the weight of a choice — what to write, what to wear, what to eat, what to think — to a language model, not because you cannot decide but because deciding has become more friction than the choice itself seems worth.

System: belonging

Decision Outsourcing to Partner

Handing the weight of a choice — what to eat, where to live, how to spend the weekend, whether to take the job — to a partner, not because they have better information but because the felt cost of deciding alone has become higher than the felt cost of being slowly less yourself.

System: reward

Decision Reversal Cycling

Making a choice, then un-making it, then re-making it, sometimes in the same hour — the relief of deciding immediately consumed by the anxiety that you decided wrong, until the cycle itself becomes the thing the day is built around.

System: reward

Decision Time Distortion

The systematic mis-weighting of near and far in decisions — the same choice felt completely differently when the consequence is six days away versus six months away, with the closer option pulling far more strongly than its actual stake warrants.

System: threat

Default Acceptance

Going along with whatever option is pre-selected — opt-in retirement contributions left at the default rate, terms-and-conditions checkboxes pre-ticked, subscription renewals not cancelled — because changing the default carries a small local cost the deliberative system declines to pay.

System: reward

Forced Choice

A decision made under externally imposed time pressure or constrained option sets — a deadline, an ultimatum, a take-it-or-leave-it — that the deliberative system never authored at its own pace and that the body integrates as compelled rather than chosen.

System: reward

Gut-Brain Decision Conflict

The recurring split in which the deliberative analysis points one way and the body's pre-verbal signal points another — and the decision-maker cannot reliably tell which to trust, often defaulting to whichever feels louder in the moment.

System: reward

Indecision Loop

The chronic oscillation between candidate choices without commitment — the Reward System cycling through the same option set repeatedly because each candidate fails to deliver the felt conviction the system requires for closure.

System: threat

Inertial Choice

Continuing along a current course not because of fresh evaluation but because stopping or changing would require the activation energy the system declines to spend — the project that runs because it is already running, the subscription that renews because cancelling is friction, the routine that persists because it persists.

System: threat

Loss-Frame Decisions

Choices made under the felt logic of *do not lose what you have* rather than *gain what is possible* — where the same underlying option is treated entirely differently depending on whether the question has been framed as a potential loss or as a potential gain.

System: reward

Maximizing

The decision strategy of searching for the best available option across the entire field — structurally appropriate for small choice sets, structurally corrosive in abundance, and the Reward System's default mode unless deliberately reset.

System: reward

Optionality Hoarding

Accumulating and refusing to close down open options — job leads, possible homes, half-pursued projects, ambiguous relationships — because the felt cost of foreclosing any one of them outweighs the felt cost of committing to none.

System: reward

Paradox of Choice

The structural finding that increased option counts often *reduce* decision satisfaction — the Reward System's promised payoff from more choice is undone by the residue of every alternative not taken.

System: reward

Post-Decision Regret

The recurring re-evaluation of a choice after it has been made — the Reward System running upward counterfactuals on a decision that no longer admits new input, producing residue that does not feed integration.

System: meaning

Pre-Commitment Strategies

Deliberately binding your future self to a decision your present self has made — telling a friend, paying in advance, deleting the app, signing a contract — so that the choice does not have to be re-made every time the Reward System gets tired.

System: reward

Pre-Decision Anxiety

The accumulating dread that arises in the window between recognising a decision needs to be made and actually making it — the Reward System's anticipatory simulation of regret running before the choice exists.

System: reward

Pros-and-Cons Fixation

The repeated re-drafting of pros-and-cons lists for the same decision — adding columns, weighting rows, re-scoring entries — as a substitute for the choice the analysis was supposed to inform.

System: reward

Reversible vs Irreversible Decision Patterns

The chronic miscalibration of decision-effort to decision-reversibility — treating reversible decisions as if they were irreversible, irreversible ones as if they could be redone, and rarely matching the deliberation budget to the stakes the choice actually carries.

System: reward

Risk-Tolerance Drift

The slow, unnoticed widening of what feels acceptable as risk — a position size, a habit threshold, a margin of safety, a daily exposure — where each small expansion sets the new baseline against which the next expansion is judged.

System: reward

Satisficing

The decision strategy of choosing the first option that meets a defined good-enough threshold — Herbert Simon's bounded-rationality alternative to maximising, and the Reward System's structurally compatible mode for abundant environments.

System: threat

Status Quo Choice

Actively choosing the current arrangement over a new alternative — the job, the city, the relationship, the routine — because the current arrangement is known and the new one is not, even when the deliberative analysis quietly favours the new one.

System: belonging

Vote-Pattern Conformity

Casting a vote, registering an opinion, or signalling a preference along the lines your peer group, family, party, or social tribe expects — even when, on examination, you do not actually believe the position you are about to defend.

Bring the cognitive patterns you just read about into reflection and habit support.

Try DojoWell for FREEGet it on Google Play
Decision Making — Cognition & Attention | DojoWell Atlas